Accenture (2017).Girls in STEM. Powering Economic Growth: Attracting more young women into Science and Technology.

Alonso, M. (2013). Best Inclusion Practices. LGBT Diversity. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Barber, N. (2004). Kindness in a Cruel World: the Evolution of Altruism. New York: Prometheus Books.

Barta, T., Kleiner, M., Neumann, T. (2012). Is there a payoff from top-team diversity? In: McKinsey Quarterly, 2.

Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bouchey, H. A., & Harter, S. (2005). Reflected appraisals, academic self-perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence.Journal of educational psychology, 97(4), 673.

Bohnet, I. (2016). What Works: Gender Equality by Design. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Byrnes & Kiger (1992). Prejudice reduction simulations: Ethics, evaluations, and theory into practice. Simulation and Games.

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?. Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1.

ChildWise (2017). The monitor report - 2017. Norwich: ChildWise

Cooper, K. M., Krieg, A., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). Who perceives they are smarter? Exploring the influence of student characteristics on student academic self-concept in physiology. Advances in physiology education, 42(2), 200-208.

Corporate Leadership Council (2012). Creating Competitive Advantage through Workforce Diversity. Arlington: The Corporate Executive Board Company.

Credit Suisse Research Institute (2012). Gender Diversity and Corporate Performance. Zurich: Credit Suisse AG.

Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of family psychology, 19(2), 294.

Díaz García, C., González Moreno, A., Sáez Martínez, F. J. (2013). Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation-Management Policy & Practice.

EUROSTAT (2017). Girls and Women Under-represented in ICT. Luxembourg.
Girls and women under-represented in ICT

Favilli, E., & Cavallo, F. (2017). Good Night Stories for Rebel Girls. Penguin UK.

Garbacik, J. (2013). Gender and Sexuality for Beginners. Random House.

Guimond, S., & Roussel, L. (2001). Bragging about one's school grades: Gender stereotyping and students' perception of their abilities in science, mathematics, and language. Social psychology of education, 4(3-4), 275-293.

Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women.

ISTAT (2017). Indagine conoscitiva sulle politiche in materia di parità tra uomini e donne. Roma.

Jan, C. T. E., & Janssens, M. A. M. (1998). Maternal influences on daughters' gender role attitudes. Sex Roles, 38(3-4), 171-186.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books.

Kurtz-Costes, B., Rowley, S. J., Harris-Britt, A., & Woods, T. A. (2008). Gender stereotypes about mathematics and science and self-perceptions of ability in late childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 386-409

Hyter, M. C., Turnock, J. L. (2009). The Power of Inclusion: Unlock the Potential and Productivity of Your Workforce. Ontario: Transcontinental.

Hunt, V., Layton, D., Prince, S. (2015). Why Diversity Matters. McKinsey Report.

Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E. (1998). Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male. Indiana University Press.

Milner, D. (1975). Children and Race. Penguin Education.

Notarnicola, A. (2015). Global Inclusion. Milan: Franco Angeli.

Nussbaum, M. C. (1986). The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (1998). Cultivating Humanity. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2004). Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). From Disgust to Humanity. Sexual Orientation & Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

OECD (2017). The Pursuit of Gender Equality. An Uphill Battle. 105-112. Paris.

Porath, C., Pearson, C. (2013 Jan, Feb). The Price of Incivility. Harvard Business Review.

Riegle-Crumb, C., Farkas, G., & Muller, C. (2006). The role of gender and friendship in advanced course taking. Sociology of Education, 79(3), 206-228.

Robnett, R. D., & Leaper, C. (2013). Friendship groups, personal motivation, and gender in relation to high school students' STEM career interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(4), 652-664.

Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental psychology, 42(1), 70.

Tapia, A. (2009). The Paradox Inclusion. Lincolnshire: Hewitt Associates.

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (2012). Born Free and Equal: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in International Human Rights Law. New York and Geneva.

Terrell, J., Kofink, A., Middleton, J., Rainear, C., Murphy-Hill, E., Parnin, C., & Stallings, J. (2017). Gender differences and bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men. PeerJ Computer Science, 3, e111

Tomasetto, C., Mirisola, A., Galdi, S., & Cadinu, M. (2015). Parents' math–gender stereotypes, children's self-perception of ability, and children's appraisal of parents' evaluations in 6-year-olds. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 186-198.

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (2012). Born Free and Equal: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in International Human Rights Law. New York and Geneva.

United Nations (2015). The World's Women 2015: Trends and Statistics. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division.

Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological science, 24(5), 770-775.

Wilson, H. J., Daugherty, P., & Bianzino, N. (2017). The jobs that artificial intelligence will create. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(4), 14